Related Articles
Founding Partner Saad Al Doseri and Legal Assistant Diana Ahmad Gharaibeh examine the amendments to Bahrain’s Commercial Companies Law, enacted through Decree Law No. 38 of 2025 (amending Decree-Law No. 21 of 2001), which represents a significant modernisation of the Kingdom’s corporate regulatory framework, enhancing transparency and streamlining corporate structures.
Key revisions include the expansion of accountability to individuals exercising actual management of a company, and the complete repeal of provisions related to Partnership by Participation companies, Sharikat Al-Muhassa (commonly referred to as Joint Ventures in practice). These revisions align legal responsibility with actual operational control and phase out company structures that no longer align with Bahrain’s evolving commercial landscape.
This article explores the key amendments in detail, their implications for existing companies, and compliance requirements moving forward.
Article (18 bis): Shifting the Scope of Liability
| Previous Wording |
| a. The promoter, partner, capital owner, the company’s manager, or the member of the board of directors in the shareholding company, closed shareholding company, limited liability company, or single person company, as the case may be, shall be liable to the extent of all his funds for any damages that may be sustained by the company, partners, shareholders, or third parties in any of the following cases: 1. If he has provided false or untrue particulars about the company’s capital in its Memorandum of Association or Articles of Incorporation or in its dealings with third parties, thereby prejudicing financial confidence in the company. 2. If he uses the company for fraudulent or illegitimate purposes. 3. If he treats the company’s funds as his own personal funds. 4. If he does not separate his personal interest from the company’s interest. 5. If he causes incurring obligations by the company despite the fact that he certainly or purportedly knows that the company is not able to perform such obligations on their maturity, or if such obligations have been incurred due to his gross negligence or wrongdoing. 6. If he causes the company’s inability to pay the taxes and fees due to government or to public entities or organizations, and he knows certainly or purportedly this, or if the company’s inability to pay such taxes and fees is due to his gross negligence or wrongdoing. 7. If he violates the provisions of the Law or the company’s Memorandum of Association or Articles of Incorporation. 8. If he exceeded its authority or committed a fraud or gross negligence in carrying out his duties. 9. If he has not acted as a prudent person in such circumstances.
b. Liability shall not be precluded if the violation has been committed as a result of a resolution adopted during the meeting of the board of directors, the constituent assembly or general assembly, unless he opposed the resolution that gave rise to the liability and recorded his objection in the minutes of the meeting. The absence of a member from the meeting in which the resolution was passed shall not be a reason for exemption from liability, unless he proves his lack of knowledge of the resolution or that he has knowledge of it but was unable to object to it. c. The liability referred to in Paragraph (a) of this Article shall either be personal relating to the promoter, partner, capital owner, manager or member of the board of directors, or joint in case of multiplicity of those who committed the violation. |
| New Wording |
| a. The director of the company, a member of the board of directors, or a member of the board of managers in a shareholding company, closed shareholding company, or limited liability company, as the case may be, as well as any person exercising actual management of the company, whether overtly or covertly, shall be personally liable with all his personal assets for any damages sustained by the company, its partners, shareholders, or third parties if it is proven that he caused the company to incur obligations as a result of his negligence, gross fault, or violation of the law, the company’s memorandum of association, or its articles of association.
b. Liability shall not be precluded if the violation has been committed as a result of a resolution adopted during the meeting of the board of directors, the constituent assembly or general assembly, unless he opposed the resolution that gave rise to the liability and recorded his objection in the minutes of the meeting. The absence of a member from the meeting in which the resolution was passed shall not be a reason for exemption from liability, unless he proves his lack of knowledge of the resolution or that he has knowledge of it but was unable to object to it.
c. The liability referred to in paragraph (a) above shall either be personal or joint and several if more than one person committed the violation. |
A significant reform introduced by Article 18 bis limits personal liability for company debts and obligations, exempting founders, shareholders, and capital owners from such liability. The liability now primarily rests with those exercising actual management control over the company, whether overtly or covertly, along with the board members.
Under this provision, directors, board members, and de facto managers are personally liable for damages resulting from negligent acts, gross negligence, or violations of applicable laws or the company’s constitutional documents. While the amendment narrows the scope of liability by exempting passive investors, it simultaneously expands liability to include any person exercising actual management, even if not officially registered in the company’s records.
This amendment embodies the fundamental corporate governance principle that decision-making authority must be accompanied by commensurate liability. While it restricts creditors’ recourse against beneficial owners, it promotes investment by enhancing protections for shareholders and founders while establishing more rigorous oversight of executive management.
Article 23 bis: Electronic Meetings as a General Rule
| Previous Wording |
| It may be provided in the company’s Memorandum of Association or Articles of Incorporation that any of the prescribed meetings in accordance with the provisions of this Law may be convened using any of the electronic or telephonic means of communication, provided that measures should be taken which ensure the following: 1. Verifying the identity of the participant in the meeting and the validity of any power of attorney on the basis of which the proxy is participating. 2. Enabling the partner or the shareholder to participate fully in the meeting, as if he was present at the venue of the meeting. This shall include knowledge of everything discussed during the meeting and expressing opinion and participating in deliberations. 3. Duly recording any statement or voting by the participant in the meeting. 4. Any other measures which may be specified in an order by the Minister concerned with trade affairs. |
| New Wording |
| Any of the prescribed meetings in accordance with the provisions of this Law may be convened using any of the electronic or telephonic means of communication, provided that measures should be taken which ensure the following: 1. Verifying the identity of the participant in the meeting and the validity of any power of attorney on the basis of which the proxy is participating. 2. Enabling the partner or the shareholder to participate fully in the meeting, as if he was present at the venue of the meeting. This shall include knowledge of everything discussed during the meeting and expressing opinion and participating in deliberations. 3. Duly recording any statement or voting by the participant in the meeting. 4. Any other measures which may be specified in an order by the Minister concerned with trade affairs. |
The Article 23 bis amendment demonstrates the legislature’s recognition of technological advancements in corporate governance. Prior to this amendment, electronic meetings were permissible only if expressly authorised in a company’s Memorandum of Association. The amended law now permits electronic or telecommunication meetings for all companies, regardless of whether such provisions exist in their incorporation documents, provided certain safeguards are observed.
This change facilitates broader participation by shareholders and board members and provides companies with the flexibility needed in today’s rapidly evolving business environment. It is also a strategic step toward integrating Bahraini companies into the global digital economy, reflecting an adaptive response to contemporary and dynamic needs.
Article (204): Electronic Voting
| Previous Article |
| Voting at the general assembly shall be conducted in the manner specified by the company’s Articles of Incorporation, and voting shall be by a secret ballot if the resolution is related to election of members of the board of directors or their dismissal or to instituting liability action against them, or if this is so requested by the chairman of the board of directors or a number of shareholders representing at least one tenth (10%) of the votes present thereat. |
| New Article Additions |
| Voting at the general assembly shall be conducted in the manner specified by the company’s Articles of Incorporation, and voting shall be by a secret ballot if the resolution is related to election of members of the board of directors or their dismissal or to instituting liability action against them, or if this is so requested by the chairman of the board of directors or a number of shareholders representing at least one tenth (10%) of the votes present thereat.
The company may adopt an electronic voting system, subject to the conditions and regulations determined by a resolution of the minister in charge of commerce. |
Article 204 has also been amended to allow companies to adopt electronic voting systems for general assembly meetings, subject to rules and conditions to be issued by the Minister of Commerce. This addition enhances transparency, facilitates participation, and reflects the shift toward digital corporate practices.
Article 226: Closed Joint-Stock Companies
| Previous Article |
| A closed shareholding company consists of a number of persons—not less than two—who subscribe in it for negotiable shares which are not offered to the public for subscription. |
| New Article Additions |
| A closed shareholding company consists of a number of persons—not less than two—who subscribe in it for negotiable shares which are not offered to the public for subscription.
The company may also be established by a single person, subject to the conditions and regulations determined by a resolution of the minister in charge of commerce. Such person shall exercise the powers of the constitutive assembly and the general assembly. |
Another key development is the amendment to Article 226, which enables the establishment of a closed joint-stock company with a single shareholder, who will exercise the full powers of both the founding and general assemblies. The amendment introduces more flexibility for investors.
This amendment, departing from the former two-shareholder requirement, aligns with modern business practices and provides enhanced flexibility for entrepreneurs and family businesses to establish and manage closed joint-stock companies independently, subject to regulatory safeguards prescribed by the Minister of Commerce.
Article (322) (c): Prolonged Decision Period
| Previous Wording |
| The Memorandum of Association of the company may also provide for its continuation with the remaining partners in case of withdrawal or death of a partner or if an order of distrait is passed against him by the Court or if he is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent. If the company’s Memorandum of Association has no such provision, the partners may, within sixty (60) days from withdrawal, death or the order of distrait or adjudication of bankruptcy or insolvency, unanimously agree on the continuation of the company among themselves. Such agreement shall not be effective towards third parties except from the date of it being entered in the Commercial Registry. |
| New Wording |
| The Memorandum of Association of the company may also provide for its continuation with the remaining partners in case of withdrawal, death, of a partner or if an order of distrait is passed against him by the Court or if he is adjudged bankrupt or insolvent. If the company’s Memorandum of Association has no such provision, the partners may, within ninety (90) days from withdrawal, death, interdiction, bankruptcy, or insolvency, unanimously decide to continue the company among themselves. Such agreement shall not be enforceable against third parties except from the date of its registration in the Commercial Register. |
Extending the decision period to 90 days enhances legal and operational flexibility for partners during critical transitions. This allows more time to navigate the complexities of reaching unanimous agreement, particularly in emotionally or legally challenging circumstances such as a partner’s death or insolvency. This change reduces the risk of unintentional company dissolution due to procedural deadlines and supports business continuity. However, the requirement for registration in the Commercial Registry to bind third parties remains unchanged, ensuring transparency and legal certainty.
Article (357):
| Previous Wording |
| Members of the board of directors, managers, the company’s staff, and the auditors shall make available to whoever is charged with the task of inspection pursuant to the foregoing Articles everything related to the company’s activities, including books, documents, and papers in their custody or to which they have the right of access.
In all cases, the board of directors, managers or auditors shall submit to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry any documents, papers, balance sheets or results of business activities at any time on the Ministry’s demand. |
| New Wording |
| Board members, managers, company staff, any person exercising actual management of the company, and auditors shall make available to any person charged with inspection pursuant to the foregoing Articles all materials related to the company’s affairs, including books, documents, and papers in their custody or to which they have access.
In all cases, the board of directors, managers, any person exercising actual management of the company, or auditors shall submit to the Ministry of Commerce and Industry any documents, papers, balance sheets, or results of business activities at any time upon the Ministry’s demand.
|
The amendment significantly expands the scope of accountability by explicitly including “any person exercising actual management of the company” among those required to cooperate with inspections and provide documents upon request, thereby aligning with international corporate governance standards and OECD principles of transparency and disclosure. This change reflects practical recognition that not all managerial authority rests with formally appointed directors or managers. By targeting individuals who exercise effective control over the company’s operations, the law ensures that regulatory oversight cannot be circumvented through unofficial or informal leadership structures. It reinforces the principle that responsibility follows function, not just title, thereby promoting greater transparency and compliance.
Abolition of “Partnership by Participation” Companies (Sharikat Al-Muhassa): Phasing Out the Joint Venture Structure
What Were Associations in Participation (Sharikat Al-Muhassa)?
These entities were companies that concealed themselves from third parties, had no legal personality, and were not subject to publication procedures. Key characteristics included:
- The Memorandum of Association specified the rights and obligations of partners and the allocation of profits and losses; however, the company was prohibited from issuing shares or negotiable instruments.
- Third parties established legal relationships exclusively with the specific partner(s) with whom they dealt, rather than with the entity itself.
- These entities constituted unincorporated and unregistered arrangements that relied on transactions conducted in the name of one or more partners.
The Cancellation and Legal Framework
The amendment abolishes this company form, and partners in such companies must regularise their status within three months from the date of the law’s enactment. All statutory references to Muhassa have been removed, and the entire chapter governing them has been repealed. Existing Muhassa structures must regularise their status within three months from the law’s effective date.
Implications of the Cancellation
- Immediate Transitional Requirements
Existing Muhassa (associations/partnerships by participation) must regularise their status within three months from the Law’s effective date, creating an urgent compliance deadline for all such entities.
- Enhanced Transparency and Regulatory Oversight
The reform phases out informal arrangements in favour of registered and regulated entities, thereby enhancing transparency. This aligns with Bahrain’s objectives to strengthen corporate accountability, conform to international standards, and simplify the corporate landscape by removing outdated entities.
- Restructuring Options
Existing entities must restructure, with options to convert into limited partnerships, WLLs, Closed Joint Stock Companies, or other recognised corporate vehicles, preferably well in advance of the three-month deadline.
- Compliance and Documentation Challenges
Companies are advised to update their governance documents and remove all references to joint venture structures. Additionally, companies must prepare for inspection requests and centralise and digitise their corporate records to facilitate immediate production upon request by inspectors and the Ministry of Industry & Commerce.
- Modernisation of Business Environment
The reforms modernise Bahrain’s corporate framework by enabling digital governance, permitting single-shareholder joint stock companies, and aligning the jurisdiction’s legal infrastructure with international standards.
Practical Steps for Affected Entities
Existing associations in participation should take the following immediate steps:
- Evaluate and select appropriate conversion options to legally compliant business forms
- Engage qualified legal counsel to navigate and complete the restructuring process
- Review and update all contractual documentation and corporate agreements to reflect the new business structure
- Provide timely written notice to all stakeholders and counterparties of the impending structural changes
- Ensure full compliance with the three-month statutory deadline to avoid penalties and potential enforcement actions
Broader Strategic Impact
This cancellation represents part of Bahrain’s broader strategy to modernise corporate governance, expand personal liability frameworks, and align its corporate framework with international practice. The elimination of these informal structures removes potential regulatory arbitrage opportunities while ensuring that all business entities operate under clear, transparent legal frameworks with robust oversight mechanisms.
The reform ultimately strengthens Bahrain’s position as a business-friendly jurisdiction by eliminating outdated, opaque structures in favour of modern, internationally recognised corporate forms that provide enhanced protection for all stakeholders and more effective regulatory oversight.
Conclusion
The amendments represent a fundamental shift toward digitalisation of corporate governance, establishing electronic meetings and voting systems as standard practice rather than exceptional provisions. This positions Bahrain at the forefront of regional corporate law modernisation, recognising that contemporary business operations demand technological flexibility and adaptability. The most significant reform lies in the expansion of personal liability to encompass any person exercising actual management control, regardless of formal title or registration status. This “substance over form” approach ensures that regulatory oversight cannot be circumvented through informal leadership structures, while simultaneously protecting passive investors and founders from operational liability.
The complete abolition of Partnership by Participation companies (Sharikat Al-Muhassa) eliminates an outdated, opaque corporate structure that lacked juristic personality and proper regulatory oversight. The three-month transition deadline for existing entities creates urgency for compliance while providing sufficient time for restructuring. The authorisation of single-shareholder closed joint-stock companies and extended decision-making timeframes demonstrates legislative responsiveness to modern business needs, particularly benefiting entrepreneurs, family businesses, and companies navigating complex transitions.
These reforms collectively demonstrate Bahrain’s strategic vision to balance investor protection with business flexibility. The amendments align with Bahrain Economic Vision 2030 and establish the Kingdom as a pioneer in regional legal reform, creating a regulatory framework that meets international standards while addressing the dynamic requirements of global commerce.
This legislation decisively strengthens Bahrain’s position as a leading financial and commercial hub by systematically eliminating regulatory arbitrage opportunities, materially enhancing corporate transparency and governance standards, and providing businesses with the technological infrastructure and structural flexibility essential for sustained competitive advantage in the modern global economy.
Authors:
Saad Al Doseri
Diana Ahmad Gharaibeh
Our Services
Banking and Finance
Our banking and finance team has developed an extensive track record over the past decade, providing specialised, high-quality advice to clients across Bahrain’s banking and financial sector.
Bankruptcy, Insolvency and Restructuring
As a premier insolvency team in Bahrain, we specialise in representing every type of stakeholder in connection with insolvency matters. Our deep knowledge of bankruptcy, insolvency and restructuring matters, combined with our practical approach, ensures our clients receive the highest quality advice.
Construction and Real Estate
Our construction and real estate team provides specialist contentious and non-contentious advice across Bahrain’s construction and property sectors, as well as on matters with an international dimension.
Corporate and Commercial
Our corporate and commercial team has extensive expertise, advising clients on transactions and day-to-day commercial matters in Bahrain. The team has established strong working relationships with key Bahraini regulators and works closely with prominent law firms across the region and beyond.
Employment
Our employment team helps clients navigate the complex landscape of local laws governing the employer-employee relationship, providing practical advice on a range of employment matters in Bahrain.
Legal Translation Service
Al Doseri Law provides legal translation as part of its comprehensive legal services in Bahrain, supporting clients where accurate legal translation is required.
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Our dispute resolution team has significant experience before the Bahrain courts at every level, as well as in local and international arbitration and mediation. We act for clients in complex cross-border disputes, drawing on deep knowledge of the Bahraini court system alongside experience of arbitral proceedings under leading institutional and ad hoc rules, including before the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution (BCDR).
Technology, Media & Telecommunications
Our team advises on a broad range of telecoms, media and technology matters. We have particular expertise in the telecoms and technology sectors, providing legal services in Bahrain to domestic and international technology companies requiring experienced local legal advice.